Shelby County Commissioners Controversial Resolution Sparks Landmark Legal Challenge from Civic Leader Rev. Dr. Gerald Kiner
Legal Affairs Staff, October 22, 2024
SHELBY COUNTY, TN —- On October 21, 2024, Rev. Dr. Gerald Kiner initiated a landmark legal challenge in the Shelby County Chancery Court against a controversial resolution that symbolizes governmental overreach. This lawsuit targets a 2020 resolution that anomalously grants county employees broad indemnifications for actions including those willful and malicious, provoking a profound debate on the misuse of power within local government. Kiner’s complaint “seeks emergency injunctive relief to halt the enforcement of a local Resolution Outlining the Procedure of Shelby County Governing the Indemnification and Defense of Shelby County Employees in Civil Litigation, sponsored by Commissioner Van D. Turner, JR which contradicts Tennessee state law regarding the representation and indemnification of government employees.”
Exposing a Flawed Resolution:
This resolution permits Shelby County to use taxpayers funds to indemnify and defend its employees, even for willful and malicious misconduct against those same taxpayers. Kiner’s legal battle highlights that this not only breaches Tennessee’s state laws, such as T.C.A. § 8-42-103(3), which strictly prohibits such broad indemnifications but also contradicts the supremacy of state law over local ordinances, as underscored by U.S. Supreme Court rulings in Arizona v. United States (567 U.S. 387, 2012) and Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh (207 U.S. 161, 1907).
Constitutional and Ethical Breaches:
Further intensifying the dispute, the lawsuit alleges that the resolution infringes upon the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. By offering a selective shield to government workers, Shelby County has effectively instituted a tiered legal system, segregating the ‘protected’ from the populace, thus fostering an environment ripe for corruption and abuse of power.
Shelby County Government Abuses of Shelby County Residents
Since the enactment of the resolution, lawsuits against Shelby County Government have notably increased, suggesting the 2020 resolution passed by the Shelby County Commissioners may have emboldened county employees, secure in the knowledge that they are backed by taxpayer-funded legal defenses. This raises significant concerns about accountability and the proper use of public resources, casting a shadow over the country’s governance and integrity.
The Broader Implications:
This court battle transcends the local arena, symbolizing a critical test of the integrity of public governance and the safeguarding of civil liberties. Legal scholars and policymakers alike are keenly observing the proceedings, recognizing the potential for this case to set a national precedent regarding the limits of local governmental powers in the face of state and constitutional law.
Conclusion:
Rev. Dr. Gerald Kiner’s suit is more than just a challenge to a local ordinance; it is a rallying cry for accountability, transparency, and the equitable application of the law. It underscores the necessity for vigilance in the face of governmental overreach and represents a crucial step towards restoring public trust and integrity in Shelby County’s governance structures.
About Post Author
